Back to coprolite
publications
RAMSHOLT,
SUFFOLK
The
earliest suggestion of the coprolites being worked in Ramsholt
was in 1851 when the village was visited by a group from the British
Association for the Advancement of Science (BSAS). They had visited William
Colchester's coprolite factory in Harwich where they observed the processes
involved in the grinding the fossils to a powder. They saw them being dissolved
in sulphuric acid and the eventual production of superphosphate. After a trip
on the steamer "River Queen" to Felixstowe they alighted at Ramsholt, to see the fossils being raised and to have the
possibility of purchasing any interesting specimens.
"The coprolite was
found in adjacent coasts, and there was a large stock of it at the mill. Many
specimens of sharks' teeth, crabs, and other fossils were found in the
coprolite and they were presented to the visitors."
(Proceedings
of the BSAS.(1851),Ipswich)
Whether
Mr Colchester had made arrangements for them to be raised with one of the local
landowners is not known. It was not until 1857 that actual evidence of an
agreement emerged. One of the largest landowners in the Eastern Counties, Lord Rendlesham, arranged to have the coprolites raised from
part of his 578 acre holding in the parish. They were worked from fields,
farmed by Charles French, where they were found below the Suffolk Crag on the
side of the River Deben. As the prices that manure manufacturers were offering
were as much as £2.50 a ton, Lord Rendlesham was keen
to realise the profits from his estates in Bawdsey, Boyton, Butley and Capel St. Andrew.
The
documents show that a Mr. Ling was the contractor. He would have employed Mr
French's labourers after the harvest was in, supervising the loading onto Mr.
French's carts which took them down to the river. Here they would have been
washed and weighed. They were then barrowed up planks and emptied into the
holds of shallow-draught lighters or barges and transported to the manure
factories in Ipswich, London and elsewhere. The records also suggest that between 1859-60 the coprolites were also worked by another
local man, Mr. Guard. With his 189 tons
and the 219 tons raised on Mr French's farm Lord Rendlesham
made a profit of £89. As the records did not continue after 1860 it is
uncertain whether they continued being raised. Up to that time 749 tons had
been worked, which, due to fluctuations in demand, were only sold at £1.50 per
ton, considerably less than expected. Mr Ling's charges were only £0.75 a ton
which would have given Rendlesham a profit of just
over £550. However, this was enough to have bought a small estate in those
days.
By
1860 it seemed the work had not been completed very well. Mr. French was
allowed £31.50 compensation for the damage done to his fields over the previous
three years and also £20.35. for carting costs and
£5.83. for implements. (Suff.R.O.
HB416.F.2
pp.31,91,127,153) Whether this Mr. Ling was the George Ling who
took on coprolite work at nearby Boyton in 1870 is
uncertain. It is quite possible that with his experience he would have been
involved in diggings in nearby parishes during the 1860s. (See author's account
of Boyton)